<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--generator='jetpack-6.9'-->
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="//datahound.scientopia.org/sitemap.xsl"?>
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9 http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9/sitemap.xsd"><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org</loc></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/04/28/longitudinal-2006-2013/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/about-datahound/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-07T21:46:31Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/04/30/the-recovery-from-the-recovery-act/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/01/longitudinal-pi-analysis-distributions/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/01/eb-sustainability-discussion-input-sought/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/05/the-recovery-from-the-recovery-act-part-deux/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/10/indirect-cost-rate-survey/</loc><lastmod>2016-05-31T23:48:17Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/13/indirect-cost-distribution-analysis-fy2013/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/15/mind-the-gap/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/20/historical-trends-in-predoc-and-postdoc-stipends-and-average-grant-sizes/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/23/rpg-distribution-2013/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/05/28/r01-size-growth-and-the-modular-cap/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/06/03/training-funds-t32-f32-f31-distributions-by-institution/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/06/10/institutional-distribution-of-nsf-graduate-research-fellowships/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T21:41:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/06/19/public-health-data-project-tycho/</loc><lastmod>2014-06-26T10:56:15Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/06/25/a0-a1-and-a2-r01-awards-from-2003-2013/</loc><lastmod>2014-06-30T13:56:35Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/06/30/nih-mechanism-tables/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-01T13:23:58Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/07/08/r01-success-rates-new-and-renewal-applications/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-17T17:41:12Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/07/17/my-first-pass-evaluation-of-the-k99-r00-program/</loc><lastmod>2014-08-12T16:17:29Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/07/21/k99-r00-evaluation-a-striking-gender-disparity/</loc><lastmod>2014-08-11T22:23:17Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/07/22/k99-r00-evaluation-ic-distribution/</loc><lastmod>2014-07-24T00:19:06Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/08/04/non-r01-individual-investigator-mechanisms-the-growth-of-r21-applications/</loc><lastmod>2014-08-05T12:06:10Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/08/08/a-pilot-study-of-continued-funding-after-holding-a-single-r21-award/</loc><lastmod>2014-08-11T11:53:47Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/08/14/gender-differences-in-r00-institutions/</loc><lastmod>2014-08-15T13:52:44Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/09/26/perspectives-on-the-npr-nih-stories/</loc><lastmod>2014-10-23T17:42:12Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/09/26/federal-reporter-a-new-tool-of-science-data-wonks/</loc><lastmod>2014-09-28T19:12:50Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/19/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-1/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-28T16:02:36Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/21/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-2-ic-distributions/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-28T15:59:10Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/22/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-3-ic-investments/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-28T15:57:52Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/23/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-4-numbers-of-authors/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-28T15:56:11Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/24/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-5-nih-funding/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-28T15:50:32Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/24/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-4-revisited/</loc><lastmod>2014-10-27T01:35:01Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/27/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-6-first-and-last-authorships/</loc><lastmod>2014-10-28T11:00:52Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/10/28/k99-r00-publication-analysis-part-7-high-profile-publications/</loc><lastmod>2014-10-28T16:20:42Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/06/k99-r00-program-f32-awardees-as-a-control-group/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-07T18:20:40Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/07/discuss-upsides-and-downsides-of-k99-r00-program/</loc><lastmod>2014-12-28T17:28:40Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/14/a-view-from-the-perspective-of-a-national-academy-of-sciences-section-on-r01-funding-outcomes/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-15T20:14:04Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/13/data-regarding-the-a2no-a2-policy/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-14T16:36:27Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/20/r01-success-rates-by-institute-and-center/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-21T01:09:38Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/25/percentages-of-a0-applications-in-the-funded-pool-by-institute-and-by-institution/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-29T21:09:22Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/11/20/r01-and-other-mechanism-funding-trends-1998-2013/</loc><lastmod>2014-11-25T20:36:25Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/01/more-on-institutional-distributions-of-the-fraction-of-a0-applications-within-the-pool-of-funded-r01-grants/</loc><lastmod>2014-12-03T13:22:54Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/02/distribution-of-r01s-across-institutions-and-individuals-2001-2014/</loc><lastmod>2014-12-03T22:59:00Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/03/age-distributions-for-nih-new-investigators-and-early-stage-investigators/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-01T18:53:51Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/03/estimated-new-investigator-distribution-for-fy2014-by-institute-and-center/</loc><lastmod>2014-12-04T21:58:27Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/04/twelve-months-of-datahound-eight-month-edition-2014/</loc><lastmod>2014-12-05T15:43:35Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/09/estimated-new-investigator-distribution-for-fy2014-by-irg/</loc><lastmod>2014-12-09T20:36:59Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2014/12/11/how-long-should-a-postdoctoral-experience-be-from-a-training-perspective/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-08T13:57:01Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/01/26/r01-distribution-for-2014-by-pi-and-ic/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-02T16:22:27Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/01/28/r01-size-distribution-for-pis-with-a-single-r01r37-grant-in-fy2014/</loc><lastmod>2015-01-31T21:52:34Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/01/30/estimated-publication-outcomes-as-a-function-of-number-of-r01-grants/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-07T16:26:10Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/01/the-tension-between-average-grant-size-and-success-rate/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-16T14:11:53Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/04/request-for-information-potential-emeritus-award-for-senior-researchers/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-05T14:37:34Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/07/longevity-and-transitions-for-r01s-in-years-40/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-10T18:02:33Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/10/should-grants-be-limited-to-a-single-renewal/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-11T18:34:03Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/10/longevity-and-transitions-in-in-r01s-in-years-40-part-2/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-10T19:04:38Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/25/year-distribution-of-competing-renewal-type-2-grants-from-1995-2014/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-27T14:11:51Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/18/age-and-the-trying-out-of-new-ideas-initial-impressions/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-20T10:41:56Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/02/26/number-of-new-and-competing-renewal-awards-from-1995-2014/</loc><lastmod>2015-02-27T14:22:42Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/03/02/the-nih-office-of-extramural-research-oer/</loc><lastmod>2015-03-03T11:35:47Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/03/17/nih-institute-and-center-strategic-plans/</loc><lastmod>2015-03-20T19:22:35Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/03/26/rock-talk-age-data-effective-indirect-cost-rates-1998-2014/</loc><lastmod>2015-03-28T02:15:33Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/03/27/more-age-data-from-nih-surprising-award-rate-data/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-21T11:46:08Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/03/28/selected-data-and-sources-relevant-to-research-enterprise-sustainability/</loc><lastmod>2015-03-31T23:54:45Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/03/31/foia-the-freedom-of-information-act/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-06T20:07:01Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/04/02/nih-request-for-information-rfi-optimizing-funding-policies-and-other-strategies-to-improve-the-impact-and-sustainability-of-biomedical-research/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-03T13:58:03Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/04/03/research-spending-at-academic-medical-centers/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-12T04:51:52Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/04/13/models-of-support-for-staff-scientist-positions/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-15T15:52:23Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/04/14/models-of-support-for-staff-scientist-positions-matching-funds/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-16T13:39:00Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/04/23/science-article-with-an-analysis-of-nih-peer-review/</loc><lastmod>2015-04-28T20:48:51Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/06/nih-emeritus-award-rfi-results-foia-request-initial-observations/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-11T02:00:13Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/07/nih-emeritus-award-rfi-results-update/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-09T03:03:53Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/07/please-comment-nih-rfi-on-optimizing-funding-policies/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-13T02:44:34Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/28/analysis-of-subsequent-years-of-k99-r00-program/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-29T13:27:23Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/28/analyzing-nih-data-with-r/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-29T22:44:45Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/28/the-number-of-nih-pis-1985-2014-the-effect-of-multiple-pis/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-29T15:58:55Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/05/28/r01-equivalent-pis-1985-2014/</loc><lastmod>2015-05-31T19:11:18Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/06/05/single-vs-multiple-r01-holders-by-ic/</loc><lastmod>2015-06-08T15:06:22Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/06/08/ic-distributions-for-r01s-from-pis-with-multiple-r01s/</loc><lastmod>2015-06-10T14:31:57Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/06/17/percentages-of-faculty-salary-support-at-academic-medical-centers/</loc><lastmod>2015-07-20T04:54:38Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/08/12/first-outstanding-investigator-r35-awards-from-nci/</loc><lastmod>2016-05-03T11:24:49Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/08/19/the-demise-of-38000-nih-funded-investigators/</loc><lastmod>2015-09-24T19:08:30Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/10/02/nobel-prize-week/</loc><lastmod>2015-10-05T16:02:37Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/10/07/lasker-to-nobel-clinical-versus-basic/</loc><lastmod>2015-10-14T17:59:14Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/10/12/lasker-to-nobel-clinical-versus-basic-part-2/</loc><lastmod>2015-10-12T13:45:17Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/10/12/nih-high-risk-programs-gender-issues-part-1-pioneer-program/</loc><lastmod>2015-10-20T01:25:26Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/10/23/gender-balance-in-nih-high-risk-research-programs-2015/</loc><lastmod>2015-12-04T20:12:14Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/10/26/nih-high-risk-programs-part-3-new-innovator-award-program/</loc><lastmod>2015-10-29T15:31:27Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/12/03/nelson-diversity-surveys-a-rich-data-source-regarding-women-and-minorities-in-science/</loc><lastmod>2015-12-11T13:49:40Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2015/12/10/gender-balance-in-nih-high-risk-research-programs-overall-award-pool-versus-applicant-pool/</loc><lastmod>2015-12-15T15:33:01Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/01/17/nih-high-risk-research-programs-racial-composition-of-applicant-and-awardee-pools/</loc><lastmod>2016-01-19T03:34:04Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/02/05/the-nih-early-career-reviewer-program-some-key-parameters/</loc><lastmod>2016-02-09T13:05:12Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/05/27/r01-size-growth-and-the-modular-cap-2016-edition-part-1/</loc><lastmod>2016-07-13T00:22:44Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/08/04/datahounds-new-littermate/</loc><lastmod>2016-08-04T17:57:45Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/09/23/drugmonkeyday/</loc><lastmod>2016-09-29T12:44:26Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/09/29/maximizing-investigators-research-awards-for-early-stage-investigators-a-high-percentage-of-administratively-rejected-applications/</loc><lastmod>2016-10-02T13:29:53Z</lastmod></url><url><loc>https://datahound.scientopia.org/2016/10/04/maximizing-investigators-research-awards-for-new-and-early-stage-investigators-gender-and-raceethnicity-issues/</loc><lastmod>2016-10-08T03:28:48Z</lastmod></url></urlset>
